WINETALK
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

WINETALK

Simply Wine / En Vino Veritas
 
HomePortalGallerySearchLatest imagesRegisterLog in

 

 2003 in Bordeaux, was that not to warm?

Go down 
AuthorMessage
Bjørn Tore Aastorp Ruud
Admin
Admin
Bjørn Tore Aastorp Ruud


Male
Number of posts : 999
Age : 55
Localisation : Lillestrøm, Norway
Emploi : Wine Consultant
Registration date : 2007-05-24

2003 in Bordeaux, was that not to warm? Empty
PostSubject: 2003 in Bordeaux, was that not to warm?   2003 in Bordeaux, was that not to warm? Icon_minitimeFri Jun 08, 2007 12:05 am

Hello all.
In Europe we generaly have a very different way of thinking when it comes to which vintages are good ar bad in BDX, than in the US. Why does Americas consumers love the big and sweet style of the 2003 vintage so much? Sweettooths?
Strange when Parker gives 100 points and some of the European wine betterknowers slaughters the same wine. An example was Ch. Pavie in the 2000 vintage, and 2000 was not as warm as 2003.
Personally I dont think a BIG and sweet wine with a lot of tosted oak, low acidity ( due to the heat ) is a good balanced wine, and not decerving the hyped prices.

Do we want this "vulgare" style of BDX? It overshadows the terroir and its difficult to tell the difference between a Cab/Merlot from South Africa and a BDX.

Of course many producers chose to harvest in August to keep their wines in balance with a good structure, so those producers are forgiven.

Best regards
Bjørn Tore
https://winetalk.forumotion.com/index.htm
Back to top Go down
https://winetalk.forumotion.com
 
2003 in Bordeaux, was that not to warm?
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Your view on Bordeaux 2003?
» BORDEAUX CENTRAL
» Ch. Lacaze 2004, AOC Bordeaux
» Is Bordeaux en Primeur a scam?
» DECANTER RECOMMENDATIONS / BORDEAUX 2006

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
WINETALK :: SIMPLY WINE-
Jump to: